tcd device (Hitachi Ltd)
Structured Review
![Fig. 3. Efficacy of scaled-up <t>TCD</t> <t>device</t> for microbial inactivation. (A) Schematic of microbial inactivation process using the scaled-up TCD device, where aerosols containing bacteria or viruses are dispersed on the device surface after charge injection. (B) Microbial inactivation efficiency for different model microorganisms [E. coli (gram-negative bacterium), B. subtilis (gram-positive bacterium), and MS2 bacteriophage (virus)]. (C) Effect of graphene on the microbial inactivation efficiency. No charg- ing voltage is applied to the device. (D) Effect of charging voltage on microbial inactivation efficiency. (E) Images showing the concentration of E. coli (left), B. subtilis (middle), and MS2 (right) at charging voltages of 20 and 1 V using the scaled-up TCD device. (F) Effect of humidity (up to 90%) and temperature (up to 60°C) on the effi- cacy of the TCD device for E. coli inactivation after 48 and 72 hours. (G) Efficacy of TCD device for bacterial inactivation when treating intermittently applied aerosols containing E. coli or B. subtilis. In (B) to (E), the experiment is performed at a fixed temperature (20°C) and humidity (30%). In (E) to (G), the TCD device is charged to 10 V, and microorganisms are measured after 1 min of attachment. Dashed lines indicate that all microorganisms are inactivated (i.e., no live microorganisms detected). Error bars represent SD (n = 3). Significant differences among groups are indicated by * and ** for P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively.](https://pub-med-unpaywalled-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_ids_ending_with_1201/pm38701201/pm38701201__page5_image1.jpg)
Tcd Device, supplied by Hitachi Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 147615 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/tcd+device/pm38701201-179-12-19?v=Hitachi+Ltd
Average 99 stars, based on 147615 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Highly efficient microbial inactivation enabled by tunneling charges injected through two-dimensional electronics."
Article Title: Highly efficient microbial inactivation enabled by tunneling charges injected through two-dimensional electronics.
Journal: Science advances
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adl5067
Figure Legend Snippet: Fig. 3. Efficacy of scaled-up TCD device for microbial inactivation. (A) Schematic of microbial inactivation process using the scaled-up TCD device, where aerosols containing bacteria or viruses are dispersed on the device surface after charge injection. (B) Microbial inactivation efficiency for different model microorganisms [E. coli (gram-negative bacterium), B. subtilis (gram-positive bacterium), and MS2 bacteriophage (virus)]. (C) Effect of graphene on the microbial inactivation efficiency. No charg- ing voltage is applied to the device. (D) Effect of charging voltage on microbial inactivation efficiency. (E) Images showing the concentration of E. coli (left), B. subtilis (middle), and MS2 (right) at charging voltages of 20 and 1 V using the scaled-up TCD device. (F) Effect of humidity (up to 90%) and temperature (up to 60°C) on the effi- cacy of the TCD device for E. coli inactivation after 48 and 72 hours. (G) Efficacy of TCD device for bacterial inactivation when treating intermittently applied aerosols containing E. coli or B. subtilis. In (B) to (E), the experiment is performed at a fixed temperature (20°C) and humidity (30%). In (E) to (G), the TCD device is charged to 10 V, and microorganisms are measured after 1 min of attachment. Dashed lines indicate that all microorganisms are inactivated (i.e., no live microorganisms detected). Error bars represent SD (n = 3). Significant differences among groups are indicated by * and ** for P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively.
Techniques Used: Bacteria, Injection, Virus, Concentration Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: Fig. 4. Investigation of antimicrobial mechanism of TCD device. (A) SEM images of bacteria (E. coli; top) and TEM images of virus (MS2; bottom) before and after attach- ment to TCD. (B) Fluorescence microscopy showing bright-field (total bacteria) and fluorescence (membrane-damaged bacteria) images of E. coli before (top) and after (bottom) attachment to TCD. (C) Change in membrane permeability of E. coli and B. subtilis (top) and percentage of bacteria with damaged membrane structures (bottom) after attachment to TCD at different charging voltages (1 to 20 V). (D) Intracellular generation of ROS after attachment to TCD. (E) Activity of bacterial superoxide dis- mutase enzyme. (F) Activity of bacterial antioxidant enzymes. (G) Intracellular adenosine 5′-triphosphate (ATP) levels in TCD-treated bacteria. (H) Expression of key genes related to ROS production and DNA integration/repair. Microorganisms were evaluated after 1 min of attachment. In (A), (B), and (D) to (H), the TCD device is charged to 10 V. The experiment is performed at a fixed temperature (20°C) and humidity (30%). Error bars represent SD (n = 3). Significant differences among groups are indicated by * and ** for P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively.
Techniques Used: Bacteria, Virus, Fluorescence, Microscopy, Membrane, Permeability, Activity Assay, Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: Fig. 5. Antimicrobial mechanism of TCD device and its potential application. (A and B) Schematic illustration of bacterial (A) and viral (B) inactivation mechanisms involved in the TCD process based on electron transfer. (C) Potential application scenario of the TCD device on high-touch surfaces in indoor environments (e.g., elevator buttons and armrests in hospitals). (D) Unique properties (reliability and robustness) of the TCD device for microbial inactivation in practical applications.
Techniques Used:
